"Spiritual, but not religious."

All of the other religions of the world.

"Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby Kafir on Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:06 am

This phrase has hundreds of thousands of google hits (even in quotes). Apparently something like a third of the U.S. population identifies themselves in those terms (depending on the phrasing of the poll.) I have no idea what it means. Does anyone?
Kafir
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:16 am

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby Grog on Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:15 pm

"I'm a good person and I want to feel nice" ?

I think a large component of it is the expectation that normal people believe in a higher power. The other part of it is that having a higher authority shifts responsibility for bad things onto someone else's shoulders.
"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important."
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Grog
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 4:28 am
Location: Dayton, OH

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby nathan on Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:35 pm

I actually heard someone say that at work the other day, and my wife had several coworkers who espoused it.

I think maybe people don't like church. ;-)
"I do not preach universal salvation; what I say is that I cannot exclude the possibility that God would save all men at the Judgment." ~ Karl Barth
User avatar
nathan
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 3:38 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby changa on Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:38 pm

A person who joins a church, attends and tithes is religious.

A person who believes in supernatural things is spiritual.

Why not either without the other?
“I’m a tall drink of water who is easy on the eyes. Plus, my moral compass is so broken I can barely find the parking lot. Long story short, on a scale of 1-to-10, I’m awesome.” -Ben Quayle
User avatar
changa
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 4:50 am
Location: here

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby ggeezz on Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:29 pm

changa wrote:A person who believes in supernatural things is spiritual.


But can't you be spiritual and a naturalist at the same time. Or is that a different meaning of spiritual?
ggeezz
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:26 pm

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby changa on Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:48 pm

ggeezz wrote:
changa wrote:A person who believes in supernatural things is spiritual.


But can't you be spiritual and a naturalist at the same time. Or is that a different meaning of spiritual?

You cannot be both.

...unless you define spirits as mind, and mind as brain activity. And then acknowledge brain activity as important because as humans, it matters to us. Spirituality reconciled with naturalism. Ta da!

If that works for you, I suspect you are not spiritualist by any classic definition. You might be humanist.


I think this is what people mean to say with "spiritual but not religious". I suspect they mean, "religious without spirituality." Obedient to the form, for form's sake.
“I’m a tall drink of water who is easy on the eyes. Plus, my moral compass is so broken I can barely find the parking lot. Long story short, on a scale of 1-to-10, I’m awesome.” -Ben Quayle
User avatar
changa
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 4:50 am
Location: here

Re: "Spiritual, but not religious."

Postby ggeezz on Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:57 pm

changa wrote:
ggeezz wrote:
changa wrote:A person who believes in supernatural things is spiritual.


But can't you be spiritual and a naturalist at the same time. Or is that a different meaning of spiritual?

You cannot be both.

...unless you define spirits as mind, and mind as brain activity. And then acknowledge brain activity as important because as humans, it matters to us. Spirituality reconciled with naturalism. Ta da!

If that works for you, I suspect you are not spiritualist by any classic definition. You might be humanist.


I think this is what people mean to say with "spiritual but not religious". I suspect they mean, "religious without spirituality." Obedient to the form, for form's sake.


I think some people see the term humanist as too Richard Dawkins. They care more about spirit/mind/brain activity than they do about science and they would rather abstract spirit from brain activity, but if you pressed for details they'd be monist (no soul).
ggeezz
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:26 pm


Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest